where has this option gone?

Yes I understand that, what I don't understand is: that the line don't bother about - the sign plus/minus - the value of the multiplier The result is always the same as showed above, no change of direction in dependence of plus/minus, no change of the length of the line in dependence of the multipli...

1 GB is to small, how to get 2 GB? Without deinstalling-installing again.

I have to dynamic lines. http://www.bilderload.com/bild/284378/gFJTGC.jpg The green one has endY- endXmultiplier 0.1, the red one 100. The result is the same? Somehow my mistake or a bug? further explanation: The lines should be a "g-circle", here they show primarily the longitudinal accel...

I think I have found the discrepancy: Vector-Acceleration is only X,Y not Z. 2- not 3-dimensional.

RT: Is it so. Is it planned so?

M.

As for matching up your calculated vector accel vs. the reported vector accel: I hope you've turned off all filtering? Yes. Filtering und smoothing are off in basic-values und calculated-values. Most time the curves are nearly identical, but not identical, sometimes you see a greater difference. M.

So long I thought 'vector acc' is the resultant of longitudinal, lateral and vertical accelration. But it isn't "sqrt(VAR_0002^2+VAR_0004^2+VAR_0006^2)" The curves partly differ much. What is 'vector acc'? The help doesn't help, Definitions of 'long accel' and 'vector accel' are wrongly th...

ThomasLE71 wrote: Is there a way to get these offsets used by the Dash3 display when it displays long and lat acc values?

Hello,
you have only build a formula in the concerning variable, unit-section of the dash-configuration-software.

M.

I wanted to recalibrate the analogue channels. respective to the help one get a message "Race Technology 2004". I get a number "14135". Is this correct or a error-code? This refers to the topic "recalibrating...", point 10 of the help Are there no conformations for well...

Hello, respective to the help one get a message "Race Technology 2004". I get a number "14135". Is this correct or a error-code? Are there no conformations for well done? Only for high or low error if the input is out of spec? M. PS It's a little bit confusing if the help is not ...

I get it: channel 8 was smoothed 1s in dash3, channel 7 not. Therefore the sensor is scattering.

M.

I have tested 1 Sensor in 2 channels (7 and eight). I get quite the same values, but in channel 7 the scattering is much larger. channel 8: 0,5 (24,8cm-25,3cm / 1,70-1,68 V) that's acceptable for the sensor channel 7: 3 (23-26cm / 1,64-1,79 V) that's too much the lower values only rarely, most time ...

Support wrote: they are simply intended to be read as low=good, high=bad. They are all very useful for idenifying problems such as patchy reception, or damaged antenna etc.

But what is good, what is bad? 1,2,3,4,5...?

M.

Andy, thanks for your review. I put my questions here, because it may be interesting for all. Which values are good? Which values are good enoug? GPS vel acc - GPS pos acc - GPS head acc - GPS rtk acc I noticed that even in good runs with definitely GPS-Lock the diagramm shows ZERO for: GPS sats, GP...

Support wrote:What is very strange is that you see a difference between std 20Hz and PPP, typically this should make no practical difference.

Yes. I thougt, the accuracy increases from 1 to 3.

I'll send you the File.

M.