| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Mats
Joined: 10 Oct 2006 Posts: 19
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 1:41 pm Post subject: Use non-std antenna with DL-1? |
|
|
Is it possible to use a non standard antenna with the DL-1? I found a nice combination antenna on a car on the carpark the other day, GPS and radio/GSM, looked like a sweet antenna to mount on my roof which some previous owner already drilled a hole in.
So is it possible or is there no antenna standard interface in the GPS industry? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mats
Joined: 10 Oct 2006 Posts: 19
|
Posted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 8:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
No-one knows?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jlucas
Joined: 29 Nov 2005 Posts: 304 Location: Delaware, OH
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
David Stewart
Joined: 02 Dec 2005 Posts: 22
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mats
Joined: 10 Oct 2006 Posts: 19
|
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2006 9:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| So as long as the connector is the same it's no problem? Are there any problems using adapter cables? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GrahamB
Joined: 23 Mar 2006 Posts: 17
|
Posted: Wed Nov 01, 2006 11:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
About 18 months ago I cartwheeled my bike at Phillip Island and the GPS stopped working. Rather than send it back to the UK, I bought a cheap antenna off Ebay, cut the cable and crimped on the appropriate connector, and away we went.
BUT... it's still not working 100%. I suspect the replacement antenna is not quite as good... but it may be the mounting. On the old bike it was mounted on an aluminium ground plane under a fibreglass panel. On the new one, the corresponding panel is carbon fibre, so it is mounted on top, without a ground-plane and sloping to the rear. One of my holiday projects is to make a better mount for it.
Aside from losing lock occasionally, the biggest irritation is that it doesn't seem able to work out the time & date in time to label the run files properly: I just came home from a weekend of racing with 35 files all claiming to have started at 1am, 1 Jan 2004... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RTUSA Site Admin
Joined: 24 Feb 2006 Posts: 468 Location: Richmond, VA, USA
|
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 7:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The default timestamp typically means that logging was started prior to getting a good GPS lock. Could be that a poor antenna (or mounting arrangement) is causing lock to take longer, could be procedure. _________________ Al Seim
Race Technology USA |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GrahamB
Joined: 23 Mar 2006 Posts: 17
|
Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 12:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, it turned out to be a compounding of errors. Because of getting a poor lock, I was missing parts of runs because my auto-start condition was GPS speed > 30km/h.
So I changed that to a supply voltage condition which meant that it started logging immediately... and hence couldn't get a lock.
Then I forgot I'd done that
Since then I've made an aluminium bracket to mount the old antenna horizontal on top of the duck-tail. Last time out the logger worked almost perfectly (still some issues with rpm pick-up via spark-in on some runs). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|